The Annapolis City Council is currently working through more than 130 proposed amendments to Mayor Littmann's FY27 budget. Most of my own amendments have been covered in earlier posts. This post is a look at what my colleagues are proposing.
I'm sharing this because the budget amendment process can be hard to follow from the outside — amendments get assigned letter codes, posted in spreadsheets, and discussed in work sessions that move quickly. Residents deserve to know what's being proposed in their name. Below is a guide to what each Alderperson and the Finance Committee have put forward.
Mayor Littmann's Own Amendments (L-1 through L-30)
The Mayor has filed 30 amendments to his own introduced budget — by far the largest individual submission. Most are technical budget corrections (aligning expenses with anticipated costs, fixing centralization transfer errors, correcting roll-ups), but several represent meaningful policy choices:
- Community Engagement Administrator (L-4) — $139,600: Adds funding for a new position in the Mayor's Office described as a "budget correction to add funding for the current and filled position." This is the Strategist position the administration described in its budget presentation.
- Make Your Mark Media (L-6) — $15,950 increase: Increases the City's TV production contract, now totaling roughly $340,000 annually.
- Harbormaster Seasonal Salaries (L-7) — $120,300: Restores most of the seasonal staffing the introduced budget had cut from the Harbormaster's Office — a cut the Harbormaster told the Finance Committee her office did not propose.
- Operations Support Contractor (L-18) — $50,000: Swaps the State Lobbyist contract for a new "Operations Support Contractor" position serving the Mayor's Office.
- AI Consultant (L-20) — $30,000: Funds a consultant to help Planning & Zoning design an application pre-qualification step using Claude.
- City Manager Administrative Assistant (L-16) — $104,907: Adds an administrative assistant for the new City Manager (currently shared with the Mayor's Office).
- Council Salary and Benefits Increase (L-14) — $17,200: Aligns the Council salary line with the mid-year increase implemented under O-13-25.
- Special Programs (L-17) — $29,400: Restores funding for African American and NO HARM community programs to $60,000, correcting what the Mayor's amendment text calls a budget error.
Several L-series amendments adjust fees on parking garages, mooring fields, and the Truxtun boat launch.
Finance Committee Amendments (FC-1 through FC-18)
The Finance Committee, chaired by Alderman Huntley, has filed 17 amendments reflecting the Committee's review of the budget:
- General Roadways/Sidewalks/Striping (FC-1) — $1,000,000: Adds $250,000 to each of four CIP lines — General Roadways, General Sidewalks, General Sidewalks-Brick, and General Striping & Marking.
- Risk Management Specialist eliminated, Real Estate Manager created (FC-3 + FC-4): Removes the proposed Risk Management Specialist position (–$92,300) and creates a new Real Estate Manager position ($106,700) at the Department of Central Services — addressing the gap I've also been raising in my own amendments about real estate workflow capacity.
- AI Capability (FC-6) — $100,000: Funds AI-assisted permitting at Planning & Zoning, partially offset by removing real estate consultant funding.
- Fire Peak-Time Medic Unit (FC-7) — ($200,000–$250,000): Requests "full accounting of costs and revenue" from the proposed peak-time medic unit. The notes indicate "only costs covered by grant" — reflecting Committee concern about the financial sustainability of this proposal.
- Centralization Savings (FC-5) — ($42,960): Targets 1% software efficiency savings through completed ITS centralization.
- MPIA Fee Update (FC-10): Updates the public records request fee schedule to charge the actual hourly rate of the responding employee rather than a flat $30/hour that does not cover costs.
- STR Fines (FC-15): Increases unlicensed short-term rental fines to $500 per night or twice the highest advertised rate, whichever is higher.
Alderman Huntley (Ward 1)
Alderman Huntley has filed his own amendments separate from the Finance Committee package:
- Contingencies and Tax Rate Cut (H-10) — $4,000,000: This is the largest single amendment in the package. It applies vacancy savings from the six largest departments (using an Olympic average of underspend over the last 4 years) and proposes splitting the savings between contingency reserves and a tax rate cut.
- Pedestrian Activated Crosswalk Signal (H-4) — $86,750: A rectangular rapid flashing beacon at the existing crosswalk on West Street at Amos Garrett Boulevard, funded by reductions in the police bathroom renovation project.
- Safety Dollars Toward Saving Resident Lives (H-3) — ($180,000): Removes funding for security guards at City Hall.
- Variable Message Boards (H-9) — $100,000: Buys more variable message boards for traffic flow management, offset by removing $100,000 from the "police-special cleaning" one-time-use line.
- Full Funding for Annapolis in Bloom (H-8) — $5,000: Moves $5,000 from Downtown Annapolis Partnership holidays to Annapolis in Bloom under Planning & Zoning.
- Enterprise AI for Innovation (H-7) — $5,000: Provides a small pot of funds for employees to experiment with paid AI tools.
Alderman Thorp (Ward 6)
Alderman Thorp's eight amendments focus almost entirely on the CIP and Public Works:
- General Roadways (T-5) — $200,000
- Traffic Safety (T-2 and T-7) — $150,000 each
- General Sidewalks (T-3) — $150,000
- General Waterways (T-1) — $100,000
- Turner Park New CIP (T-6) — $50,000
- ITS Consolidation Savings (T-8) — ($17,647)
All of Alderman Thorp's CIP additions share a common offset: reducing the proposed $2 million for designing all three fire stations in FY27, instead funding only the first fire station's design and pushing the second and third to outyears.
Alderwoman Smith-Brown (Ward 3)
Alderwoman Smith-Brown's amendments focus on her ward and stormwater resilience:
- Poplar Avenue Safety & Infrastructure (SB-1) — $125,000: Traffic calming, signage replacement, and safety island reconstruction.
- Bywater Road Resilience Park (SB-2) — $50,000: A Resilience Authority partnership combining green space and stormwater function.
- Ward 3 Tennis Court Construction (SB-3) — $30,000: Pre-construction engineering for an FY28 build.
- City-Wide "Clean Team" Pollution Response (SB-5, jointly with Alderwoman O'Neill) — $100,000: Recurring operating request to intercept trash before it reaches storm drains, with attention to hotspots like the Spa Creek-Heritage Community.
Alderwoman Contee (Ward 4)
Alderwoman Contee has filed two amendments focused on Eastport:
- Stipend for Eastport Recreation Center and Upkeep of Buildings and Grounds (C-1) — $50,000: Supports a person or organization to keep the centers open and the community clean.
- Eastport Community Gardens (C-2, jointly with Alderwoman O'Neill): Marketing funding as the Community Gardens begins operating.
Alderwoman O'Neill (Ward 8)
Alderwoman O'Neill co-sponsored the Eastport Community Gardens (C-2) and the Clean Team (SB-5) amendments with her colleagues, and filed one amendment of her own:
- Clay Street Beautification (O-1) — $10,000: A sweep through West Washington Street and Clay Street for sidewalk and street maintenance. (This amendment has since been withdrawn.)
A Few Observations
Several themes are visible when you look at the full set of amendments together:
- Roads, sidewalks, and pedestrian safety appear repeatedly. Between Finance Committee FC-1 and Alderman Thorp's T-3 and T-5, there is significant Council support for adding to the general roadways and sidewalks CIP lines. Pedestrian safety appears in Alderman Huntley's H-4 (rapid flashing beacon) and the Finance Committee's traffic-related items.
- Real Estate workflow capacity is a shared concern. The Finance Committee's FC-3/FC-4 swap (Risk Management Specialist for Real Estate Manager) aligns with the workflow gap I've been raising — over $11 million in capital projects has been stalled by unresolved real estate matters.
- The Fire peak-time medic unit is drawing scrutiny from multiple directions. FC-7 asks for a full accounting of costs and revenues; my own amendment proposes holding back the unit until the Fire Department's Strategic Plan analysis is complete.
- Several amendments are paired or duplicative. The system tracks these so they can be reconciled — for example, FC-1, H-1, T-3, and T-5 all touch the same CIP roadway/sidewalk lines; FC-6, S-33, and L-20 all touch AI permitting at Planning & Zoning.

Showing 2 reactions